Sunday, September 25, 2022
Home Bearing Witness The Twitter Whistleblower's Testimony Has Senators Out for Blood

The Twitter Whistleblower’s Testimony Has Senators Out for Blood


Many of Silicon Valley’s fiercest watchdogs on Capitol Hill are now snarling. Yesterday’s arresting testimony by Twitter’s former security chief, Peiter “Mudge” Zatko, has lawmakers in both parties redoubling their efforts to reign in the tech titans.

Zatko’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee follows a detailed report he submitted to the US Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Federal Trade Commission late last month. His allegations, which were the central subject of yesterday’s hearing, range from claims of lax security protocols to negligent leadership—all of which Twitter denies.

Even as senators were left seething—guess they aren’t fans of Twitter’s 4,000 or so employees having easy access to their accounts and millions of others, as Zatko alleges—there’s also a sense of renewal in the air at the Capital.

“That was a fun one,” Republican Senator Mike Lee told WIRED afterward the hearing.

The anger cloaked in elation is, in part, because many senators feel they now found the proverbial smoking gun.

“My guess is that this testimony today will trigger a lot of class action lawsuits,” senator John Kennedy of Louisiana said after questioning the witness on Tuesday. “And it should.”

The Republican is referring to Zatko’s allegation that the social media platform lacks basic security measures, like tracking which of the companies hundreds of engineers are inside the platform making changes. This includes, according to Zatko, the potential mining of a United States senator’s own account.

“I’m assuming they have,” Kennedy said.

Hence the snarling. Like the rest of us, United States senators are protective of their private data. And a growing consensus in Washington is that the FTC is Ill-suited to take on social media giants who, according to Zatko, laugh off $150 million fines and all the demands the FTC places on bad tech actors.

“Maybe the thing to do is put it in the hands of private litigants,” Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri said. “Lawsuits are powerful things, so maybe it’s, we let the folks who are getting doxed and the folks who are getting hacked and whatever—we give them the power to go into court. Then you get discovery.”

While senators plan to ask—likely with an assist from subpoenas—Twitter officials to testify in response to the accusations from their former executive, they also don’t seem to be waiting. The Missouri Republican is now trying to breathe new life into his out-of-the-box proposal to move the FTC’s tech portfolio to the Department of Justice, though he’s open to many reform ideas floating around Washington.

Hawley and outspoken senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina are renewing their calls to eradicate Section 230—the law, passed by Congress in the internet’s infancy, that protects online companies from certain kinds of litigation for content users publish on their platforms.

“You’ve got to license the people. Apparently, money doesn’t matter to them. Losing your ability to operate would matter,” Graham said. “So if you were licensed, then you have something you could lose.”



Source Link: https://www.wired.com/story/peiter-mudge-zatko-twitter-senate-judiciary-testimony/

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular